Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts

Sorry, That Wasn't Heaven...  

Scientific American - Charles Q. Choi - September 12, 2011


Peace of Mind: Near-Death Experiences Now Found to Have Scientific Explanations

Near-death experiences are often thought of as mystical phenomena, but research is now revealing scientific explanations for virtually all of their common features. The details of what happens in near-death experiences are now known widely—a sense of being dead, a feeling that one's "soul" has left the body, a voyage toward a bright light, and a departure to another reality where love and bliss are all-encompassing.

Approximately 3 percent of the U.S. population says they have had a near-death experience, according to a Gallup poll. Near-death experiences are reported across cultures, with written records of them dating back to ancient Greece. Not all of these experiences actually coincide with brushes with death—one study of 58 patients who recounted near-death experiences found 30 were not actually in danger of dying, although most of them thought they were.

Read more>>

Follow me on Twitter. Golden Platypus is updated often; the easiest way to get your regular dose is by subscribing to our news feed. Stay on top of all our updates by subscribing now via RSS or Email.

Read More...

Science Explains Religion  

Los Angeles Times - By J. Anderson Thomson and Clare Aukofer, July 18, 2011

Before John Lennon imagined "living life in peace," he conjured "no heaven … / no hell below us …/ and no religion too."

No religion: What was Lennon summoning? For starters, a world without "divine" messengers, like Osama bin Laden, sparking violence. A world where mistakes, like the avoidable loss of life in Hurricane Katrina, would be rectified rather than chalked up to "God's will." Where politicians no longer compete to prove who believes more strongly in the irrational and untenable. Where critical thinking is an ideal. In short, a world that makes sense.

In recent years scientists specializing in the mind have begun to unravel religion's "DNA." They have produced robust theories, backed by empirical evidence (including "imaging" studies of the brain at work), that support the conclusion that it was humans who created God, not the other way around. And the better we understand the science, the closer we can come to "no heaven … no hell … and no religion too."


Read more>>

Follow me on Twitter. Golden Platypus is updated often; the easiest way to get your regular dose is by subscribing to our news feed. Stay on top of all our updates by subscribing now via RSS or Email.

Read More...

But Isn't it Obvious There's a God?  

I hear this one quite frequently. Somehow or other the conversation gets round to the fact that I'm an atheist, i.e. I lack a belief in the existence of the Judeo-Christian God. After catching his jaw before it can hit the ground, my interlocutor asks how I could not believe in God. I reply that I know of no evidence to justify a belief in his existence. Their response: "But isn't it obvious that there's a God? Just look around!" Or something like that.

To those of you who think it's obvious, I say this: What seems obvious to us is often wrong. Our senses and intuition can only take us so far in our quest for truth. In fact, they frequently lead us away from truth.

For example: It seems intuitively true to us that the Earth is a plane, flat as a pancake. It took scientific inquiry to demonstrate that the Earth is closer to spherical in shape. It seems obvious to us that the Sun circles the earth, rather then the other way around. It took science to show us the truth.

Check out Richard Dawkins on this below:



Follow me on Twitter. Golden Platypus is updated often; the easiest way to get your regular dose is by subscribing to our news feed. Stay on top of all our updates by subscribing now via RSS or Email.

Read More...

How "Science Saved My Soul" - Video  

Definitely worth watching in its entirety...



Follow me on Twitter. Golden Platypus is updated often; the easiest way to get your regular dose is by subscribing to our news feed. Stay on top of all our updates by subscribing now via RSS or Email.

Read More...

The miraculous mission?  

At the request of Christian relatives I take at look at "Miraculous Mission," a DVD presentation that promises, on the box cover, to pick up where the story of Jesus leaves off and show me the story of the twelve apostles, "using 21st century technology" so that "faith and science collide." (I'm not sure if they mean that faith and science get into a fight in the video or if they come together in peace. Guess I'll see.) Here goes!

The first thing I notice is, there is no expectation that this will be watched by anyone using critical thinking skills. Statements are made that are patently false, but who's going to question them? An example in the introduction: "According to ancient eyewitness accounts, on the third day, Jesus rose from the dead." The truth is there are no eyewitness accounts of Jesus' resurrection. No one knows who wrote the so called gospels, they are completely anonymous and were written decades after the events they purport to describe.

From there the narrator tells the story from the point of view of someone who has already decided that the Bible is all true. Jesus dis this, the apostles did that, whatever it says in the Bible, blah blah blah. I thought they were going to prove this stuff. OK, I'll keep watching.

They seem very hyped up on how these ordinary men could have so changed the course of human history. That seems to be very impressive, proof of the truth of their claims, and even miraculous to these folks. I guess the inventor of Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, not to mention general relativity and Coca Cola, must also have been miracle workers.

Hmm, he's saying now that neither the biblical nor historical accounts tell us much about the apostles. So from whence will we get our information for the rest of the video? I can't wait to find out!

OK, they're hinting that science can now assist us in finding out about these guys.

They're trotting out a couple of professors of New Testament and History who don't really say anything about proof that these men even existed, then they go back to some regular folks talking about the "almost supernatural" aspect to the way these ordinary men changed the world. There must be some real scientific proof coming soon.

Nothing yet. A cute girl in a soccer outfit is asking me how these ordinary men could have overcome all the forces against them (Rome, Jewish leaders) to spread the message around the world. Not proof of anything, but I'm still hopeful.

More stuff from the Bible accepted as fact. Then a guy with his kid telling me how amazed he is that these apostles gave up everything to follow Jesus. First, there's nothing amazing about that whatsoever. Just ask your Aunt Marge, who last week sent another ten grand to her boyfriend in Nigeria, whom she's never met in person, who lost his wallet and can't get home. Second, just because it says it in a book doesn't make it true!

OK, now we're talking. They show an ancient inscription that proves Pontius Pilate really existed. Then the James Ossuary, a stone box used to house human bones, with the Aramaic words "Ya'akov bar-Yosef akhui diYeshua," or "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus," comes up, although the narrator admits there's controversy surround its authenticity. In fact, the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) declared it to be a forgery in 2003. Google it. Is that it? They're moving on, but this proves nothing!

More proof of the existence of Jesus in the writings of people in the "2nd through the 5th centuries." But what did those people rely on for the information? The same anonymous, decades out of date writings that we have today.

Another professor telling me that "Matthew tells us that Jesus..." blah blah. I know this guy must know that we have no idea who wrote the book of Matthew! He goes on: "Time after time, he demonstrated his miraculous power," healing diseases, etc., etc.

I can't do this anymore. A waste of time. This video was put together by and for people who have already decided, on blind faith, that the Bible is true, and who will grasp at the most insubstantial so-called proof they can scrape together to bolster that faith.

Now I have to figure out what to tell my relatives. Any ideas?

Follow me on Twitter. Golden Platypus is updated often; the easiest way to get your regular dose is by subscribing to our news feed. Stay on top of all our updates by subscribing now via RSS or Email.

Read More...

Pope to Hawking: We should not inquire into the beginning  

Nothing has changed. The Catholic church is still afraid of science, as it should be, since science discovers truth about the reality of the cosmos and the church is wholly invested in mythology.

Watch this Leonard Mlodinow, co-author of "The Grand Design," interview: God is unnecessary...



Follow me on Twitter. Golden Platypus is updated often; the easiest way to get your regular dose is by subscribing to our news feed. Stay on top of all our updates by subscribing now via RSS or Email.

Read More...

Who'd a thunk it? Galileo was wrong!  

Friends, this is one conference you don't want to miss!

Sign up here!

Follow me on Twitter. Golden Platypus is updated often; the easiest way to get your regular dose is by subscribing to our news feed. Stay on top of all our updates by subscribing now via RSS or Email.

Read More...

Does religion just focus on answering different questions than science?  

You've heard it before: There's no incompatibility between religion and science. They just seek to answer different questions. Science asks how; religion asks why.

Wrong.

First, both religion and science seek to describe the nature of reality. Because of this they must overlap and compete in the arena of explanations for what is.

Second, religion does not answer any questions, in any arena, with answers that can be verified, at least not when it proposes supernatural answers. It can only speculate. To say that God created everything is not an answer with any meaning, since this assertion cannot be verified. Scientific hypotheses, on the other hand, can be, and are, tested. They can either be confirmed as valid explanations of reality or disconfirmed.

Follow me on Twitter. Golden Platypus is updated often; the easiest way to get your regular dose is by subscribing to our news feed. Stay on top of all our updates by subscribing now via RSS or Email.

Read More...

Dawkins - If Science Worked Like Religion  



Follow me on Twitter. Golden Platypus is updated often; the easiest way to get your regular dose is by subscribing to our news feed. Stay on top of all our updates by subscribing now via RSS or Email.

Read More...

God and Scientists  

"For more than 1500 years Christians saw the Bible as the primary source of knowledge, but in the 17th Century a scientific revolution challenged the Christian view of the world. Eminent scientist Colin Blakemore interviews scholars and churchmen in order to understand how science transformed Christianity over the last four centuries. He shows how scientists born of the Enlightenment realised that the laws of the universe were there to be discovered, not read about in the Bible. He argues that science is the biggest challenge Christianity has ever had to face, and that it will eventually make religion unnecessary."

Compass

Follow me on Twitter. Golden Platypus is updated often; the easiest way to get your regular dose is by subscribing to our news feed. Stay on top of all our updates by subscribing now via RSS or Email.

Read More...

Why science is way better than religion  

While both science and religion can be called "world views," science is as different from religion as day is from night. I just posted over on Singularity & Futurism an article called "Memristors - The pathway to artificial intelligence?" that reminded me of one of the most important differences between the two.

Science actually discovers truth about the universe in which we live. This truth, when discovered and applied, is demonstrably accurate, as all truth should be, as evidenced by how it works in the real world. Science is real. It works in the real world, and the undiscovered country of things science does not yet know continues to grow smaller.

Certainly the religious adherent may say at this point that religion does the same. But I ask you: What has religion ever discovered? What has religion ever revealed about how our world works?

Religion, at least in its non-supernatural aspects, describes the human condition and what humans have learned about themselves by long, sometimes painful, experience. All well and good, but in doing so it is no different or better than philosophy.

Religion tends to be about coveting the past, while science tends to be about reaching for the future. Listening to Dr. Vernon McGee on one of his Bible broadcasts, I was struck by the irony of his deriding "all this newfangled technology," whilst making excellent use of it to promote his worldview. I daresay no religious individual would want to do without the advantages of technological progress (even the Amish use the wheel), while millions do without religion quite nicely.

What say you?

Follow me on Twitter. Golden Platypus is updated often; the easiest way to get your regular dose is by subscribing to our news feed. Stay on top of all our updates by subscribing now via RSS or Email.

Read More...

Christians not allowed to accept evolution, says Discovery Institute  

NewScientist - May 28, 2009, by Amanda Gefter

The Discovery Institute – the Seattle-based headquarters of the intelligent design movement – has just launched a new website, Faith and Evolution, which asks, can one be a Christian and accept evolution? The answer, as far as the Discovery Institute is concerned, is a resounding: No.

The new website appears to be a response to the recent launch of the BioLogos Foundation, the brainchild of geneticist Francis Collins, former head of the Human Genome Project and rumoured Obama appointee-to-be for head of the National Institutes of Health. Along with "a team of scientists who believe in God" and some cash from the Templeton Foundation, Collins, an evangelical Christian who is also a staunch proponent of evolution, is on a crusade to convince believers that faith and science need not be at odds. He is promoting "theistic evolution" – the belief that God (the prayer-listening, proactive, personal God of Christianity) chose to create life by way of evolution.

It sounds like a nice idea, but to my mind any time you try to reconcile science and religion by rejecting Stephen Jay Gould's notion of "non-overlapping magisteria" and instead try shoehorning them into a single worldview, something suffers. My concern is that science will take the hit – and Collins's speculative arguments about divine intervention via quantum uncertainty seem dangerously poised for the punch. The Discovery Institute's concern, on the other hand, is that Christianity will take the hit. "For Christians," they write on their website, "mainstream theistic evolution raises challenges to traditional doctrines about God's providence, the Fall and the detectability of God's design in nature." For them, reconciling evolution and religious faith is simply a hopeless endeavour.

Read more>>

Follow me on Twitter. Golden Platypus is updated often; the easiest way to get your regular dose is by subscribing to our news feed. Stay on top of all our updates by subscribing now via RSS or Email.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Read More...

Missing Link Found - The 8th Wonder of the World  

SkyNews - May 19, 2009, by Alex Watts

Scientists have unveiled a 47-million-year-old fossilised skeleton of a monkey hailed as the missing link in human evolution.

The search for a direct connection between humans and the rest of the animal kingdom has taken 200 years - but it was presented to the world today at a special news conference in New York.

The discovery of the 95%-complete 'lemur monkey' - dubbed Ida - is described by experts as the "eighth wonder of the world".

They say its impact on the world of palaeontology will be "somewhat like an asteroid falling down to Earth".

Researchers say proof of this transitional species finally confirms Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, and the then radical, outlandish ideas he came up with during his time aboard the Beagle.

Sir David Attenborough said Darwin "would have been thrilled" to have seen the fossil - and says it tells us who we are and where we came from.

Read more>>

Follow me on Twitter. Golden Platypus is updated often; the easiest way to get your regular dose is by subscribing to our news feed. Stay on top of all our updates by subscribing now via RSS or Email.

Read More...